in

Mars board member accused of stamping on the foot of ex-employee at the center of JAB Holdings lawsuit


People go to the M&M retailer in Times Square on July in New York City.

Spencer Platt | Getty Images

A former Mars government is claiming {that a} member of the household and the firm’s board “stamped” on his foot and instructed him that he would remorse his selection to depart for a place with JAB Holdings.

The allegation is a component of JAB Holdings’ rebuttal towards a commerce secrets and techniques lawsuit filed by Mars in May in federal court docket in Washington, D.C. The M&M maker claims that Jacek Szarzynski, who previously served as CFO of Mars’ pet-care enterprise and is called as a defendant in the swimsuit, stole upward of 6,000 paperwork from Mars and handed them over to JAB. The newest salvo, which was first reported by the Financial Times, is a uncommon look behind the curtain into the two privately held corporations.

Szarzynski known as the lawsuit “vindictive and unnecessary,” saying that whereas he nonetheless had some Mars paperwork in his possession, he by no means used or meant to make use of them for his personal profit or to hurt his former employer. He is now a associate at JAB, which is the funding arm of the Reimann household, and serves as chief working officer and chief monetary officer at Pret Panera, one of its enterprise items.

“Mars is a private, family-owned business, and the Mars family reacts with brutality to any perceived slight,” he wrote in a court docket submitting Aug. 20. “They were upset that, after 24 years working for Mars, I had the temerity to leave.”

Szarzynski claimed that Frank Mars, who shares a reputation with firm’s founder and sits on its board, “intentionally” stepped on his foot after one of his closing displays in entrance of the Mars board in December 2018.

“As Mr. Mars stared at me aggressively, his foot on top of mine, he warned me, ‘Tell your new boss we will never forgive him taking people like you from us and will fight him aggressively,'” he alleged.

Mars mentioned in an announcement to CNBC that the arguments are “an attempt to divert attention from wrongdoing and paint a misleading picture.” The firm mentioned it’s assured that its lawsuit will probably be profitable.

“Mr. Szarzynski and JAB do not dispute these facts,” the firm mentioned. “We tried to resolve this issue amicably, but unfortunately we were unable to do so. JAB was unwilling to agree to a comprehensive settlement.”

In its authentic criticism, Mars additionally accused the former government of expense fraud. Szarzynski estimated that the bills couldn’t be value quite a lot of hundred {dollars} and mentioned that he has provided Mars reimbursement for any errors. He alleged that the firm has rebuffed the suggestion.

Szarzynski additionally claimed that Mars wrongfully withheld incentive compensation awards owed to him with an estimated worth of greater than $1 million. Moreover, he argued that the dispute needs to be solved by means of arbitration with Mars or in Belgian courts, the place he resides and previously labored for Mars.



Source hyperlink

What do you think?

Written by Business Boy

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Loading…

0

California’s Newsom deploys new coronavirus reopening framework, most counties under strict orders

Abbott is testing its rapid coronavirus test on asymptomatic people in hopes of expanding FDA authorization